🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to prohibit social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are moving toward parallel bans.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that smartphones and networks are "stealing our kids' innocence". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media participants. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to approve a bill lifting the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended parents to block their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding motion calling for a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" nature of these services, the move does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," said the parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any action must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. One foundation set up by the relatives of a girl who was lost after encountering dangerous online content contends that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to create tools that are appropriate and suitable for children," commented a influential peer.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, legislation is primarily happening at the state level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a law prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional use needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures requiring guardian approval for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to copy Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, world bodies strike a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The agency points out that the internet can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

Even as this global debate unfolds, the steps of this nation and its followers demonstrate that policymakers globally are no longer content to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.